A Rule You Cannot Check Is Not a Rule

A written plan is supposed to constrain what happens at the open. A good part of most plans constrains nothing at all, because the lines cannot be checked afterwards by anyone, including the person who wrote them. That is why orb trading rules lalinetlasiren treats verifiability as the first property a line has to have, ahead of whether it is a good idea. Only take high quality setups and stay patient during the first fifteen minutes both read like trading rules and neither can be marked pass or fail against a log, which makes them impossible to break and therefore impossible to follow.

The Test Is Whether a Stranger Could Mark It

Hand the rule and yesterday's records to someone who was not there. If they can say followed or not followed without asking you a question, the rule is checkable. If the answer requires knowing what you were thinking, it is not a rule yet. The test takes seconds and disqualifies a surprising share of most plans.

Unverifiable Rules Are Worse Than No Rule

They occupy the slot where a real constraint should sit, and they provide a feeling of discipline with none of the mechanism. Worse, they can never be assessed, so a strategy carrying several of them cannot be improved: the review has nothing to work with and defaults to discussing outcomes, which is the one thing a single session cannot teach.

Most of Them Can Be Repaired

Behind every vague rule there is usually a specific one. High quality setups becomes a named list of conditions that must all hold. Stay patient becomes no entry before the opening range has completed. Do not overtrade becomes a maximum of two entries per session. The repaired version is narrower than the original and that narrowness is the point.

Some Should Just Be Deleted

A few lines resist repair because they were never about behaviour. Trade with confidence describes a state rather than an action, and no rewriting turns it into something a log can check. Those belong out of the plan entirely. Keeping them dilutes everything around them, since a book where half the lines are unfalsifiable trains you to read all of them loosely.

What the Log Has to Carry

Verifiability depends on the record as much as on the wording. A rule about entry timing needs timestamps. One about size needs the position and the stop distance. One about the timeframe used needs that written down at the time, not reconstructed after the closing bell. Every rule implies a field, and if the field is missing the rule is unverifiable no matter how precisely it was phrased.